Living through a Paradox

The lights have just gone off and I am now in battery mode on my computer. It is 7:30 at night, and the sounds of generators starting and humming now fill the night. I am in Ghana, which means the lights may or may not go on again tonight.
I find myself living through a paradox. Has Ghana not recently begun drilling for oil, one of Earth’s most prized energy sources? It produces 80,000 barrels of crude a day, pale in comparison to Nigeria’s 2.5 million barrels of daily output but certainly enough to keep the lights on in some parts of the country. Where is all of the oil going?

This is a problem which plagues all of sub-Saharan Africa, and an issue which most of the world – except the few benefitting from oil production in the region – is now very familiar with. Nigeria is the biggest basket case: despite producing 2.5 million barrels of oil per day, it is a net importer of fuel. Angola, with steel-fisted Dos Santos at the helm, is another puzzling case. How did the world sit back and ‘allow’ Luanda morph into an enclave of multimillion dollar housing complexes, US$300 meals, champagne and hummers? The two million barrels of crude produced in Angola each day further enriches Dos Santos and his cronies. Then we have the ‘lesser’ producers, such as Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea and Congo Brazzaville, each with its own corrupt leaders and greedy customers. In total, there is an average of 10 billion barrels of oil produced in Africa. But what benefits have come about from this production?

Going back to Ghana, the Ghana Oil Fund has, according to the World Bank, accumulated savings in the range of US$69.2 million. I do not dare estimate what the value of the oil extracted was that yielded this sum but regardless: there is little disputing that this is a substantial sum of money. So why not improve your capacity to generate electricity, to construct facilities capable of turning your rich, untapped reserves of oil into the electricity needed to transform your country into the developed nation your delusional Vision 2020 alleges you will become by the year 2020.

Make no mistake. The resource curse is alive and well in Ghana today.

Briefing: Fair Trade for Whom?

It appears that as an idea, Fair Trade mining has finally captured the consumers’ conscience. Through extensive lobbying, many of the organizations that make up the umbrella Fair Trade Labelling Organizations International (FLO) have successfully popularized this idea, painting the picture that the acquisition of so-called Fair Trade minerals is helping to lift some of the world’s poorest people out of poverty. But further analysis reveals an entirely different story.

Apart from gold mining – a discussion which I will leave for another day – perhaps the most intriguing cases in this context is coloured gemstones. How can Fair Trade schemes be launched for these high-value commodities, which only occur in a handful of countries? There are now a host of international players involved in the production, distribution and sale of coloured gemstones. At first glance, it would appear that implementing a superimposed system of Fair Trade in such instances would be an impossible feat. Closer investigation underscores just how difficult this can be.

Take, for example, the case of Nyala ruby, a much-coveted precious stone sourced from Malawi which the Washington State-based distributor Columbia Gemhouse has curiously – and potentially, prematurely – has labelled a ‘Fair Trade Gemstone’. This classification seems to have arisen on the basis of the organization knowing where the stones are being sourced from, and that production is taking place under certain conditions. But the message is very different on the ground. If we were to follow the model in place for agricultural commodities, it would mean that Columbia Gemhouse is partnering with impoverished small-scale gemstone operators, which is not the case. It is rather partnering with a series of ‘local’ businessmen (of Indian descent) who run a large-scale operation. During interviews, these men shared their own ideas about Fair Trade that were completely different from those of Columbia Gemhouse and small-scale miners.

The reality is that each of the different parties involved has a very different perception of what Fair Trade is. Research is ongoing to unpack each of these viewpoints further but in the meantime, the customer should not be told they are purchasing a commodity which could be the furthest thing from Fair Trade.